Archive for the ‘Bravo’ Category

Bravo Still a Few Series from the Bottom of the Barrel

Wednesday, April 18th, 2007

Surprise!I’m not going to say that you should watch Shear Genius this evening, but I will tell you that I am – and not just because tonight’s guest judge has a totally awesome blog that I’m sure he writes himself. I’m reluctant to criticize this show for various reasons, but I’d be seriously remiss if I didn’t just a little.

The idea of a competition show based on hair styling is almost too stupid to bear, but Bravo really can’t help itself. The M. Night Shyamalan of reality programming, Bravo took a successful and lauded phenomenon and copied the formula over and over until it was almost unrecognizable. Shear Genius may be a fourth-generation hunchbacked clone with webbed toes, but unlike its immediate predecessor, it’s actually kind of fun to watch.

The supreme failure of Top Design wasn’t the lame premise – that was a given. Almost all shows like these are fundamentally stupid, but salvation is always possible through proper casting. And casting is one thing that Shear Genius has done incredibly well. They’ve created a perfect ratio of annoying whiners, indignant prima donnas and flamboyant stereotypes. There’s even a girl who loves cutting hair so much, just talking about it brings her to tears. Jaclyn Smith’s gravelly voice doesn’t provide the comfort of Heidi Klum’s ever-dissolving German accent, but she’s heads above poor Todd Oldham. Sally Hershberger may look like a poor man’s Chrissie Hynde, but I admire people who refuse to let go of decades past, and her bitchiness could prove entertaining later on.

Almost all of its failures are unavoidable and ultimately forgivable. Though it would be nice if Bravo took their gigantic programming gaps as an opportunity to be innovative, it’s understandable that they’d try to cater to their core viewers while we all wait with bated breath for the next Tim Gunntastic season of Project Runway. It’s not as captivating as Work Out (my guiltiest pleasure), but Shear Genius does a bang-up job of not being boring. And given the low expectations, isn’t that all we can really ask for?

Bravo Reality Roundup: Et tu, Sam?

Thursday, February 1st, 2007

I don’t know what was more disappointing about last night’s Top Chef finale – Ilan’s completely undeserved victory or the shady circumstances of his win. Actually, it was definitely the circumstances! Sam Talbot had been favored to win by myself, a poll of viewers and probably most of all by stoner host Padma Lakshmi, who was choking back tears last week when she told him to pack his knives in part one of the finale. Sam is extremely talented and charming, so when he showed up last night as one of Marcel’s sous-chefs, it looked like Ilan was going to get blown out of the saffron-infused water.

But Sam ended up being more of a liability than an asset to poor Marcel. In lieu of focusing his contempt on Ilan, who completely stole his spot in the finale, Sam may very well have taken Marcel out of the running with trash-talking at the elimination table and stolen credit for Marcel’s most well-received dish. I’ve never had sea beans before, and I never care to if they’re soaked in the bitter brine of betrayal.
When it looked as if it wouldn’t get any worse, the promise of “never before seen” chef-on-chef snark during the commercials of Bravo’s premiere episode of Top Design was enough to entice me.

If opening credits were ever indicative of a program’s overall quality and tone, they are on Top Design. In what I hope is some producer-sanctioned ditty and not a song that exists in full somewhere, bizarre nineties techno music introduces us to the contestants while a robotic woman pants and moans a series of ahs and heys. By the time the show actually starts, I am on the floor laughing with no chance of getting back up before the end of the hour. Not that anything else is funny – the boredom is so suffocating that moving back to the couch would require energy I simply can’t spare.

poor lisaNone of these folks really break the Bravo mold. Over the first ten minutes we’re introduced to a series of varyingly eccentric women, flamboyant gays, would-be gays and one self-loathing gay. The only relief comes in the form of 35-year-old skateboarding Ryan, who, despite giving off the air of an archetypal douche bag, is the only person who offers any sort of intelligent behind-the-scenes commentary. There’s also Lisa, who has the potential to be the voice of black wisdom, but she mostly just looks like a middle-aged Storm from X-Men. Given Marcel’s resemblance to Wolverine, I could easily explore the correlation between the Bravo lineup and X-Men for several hours, but I’ll digress.

Todd Oldham shows up as the much-hyped host, trying to prove that he can offer us more than an affordable line of Target linens. He’s not as entertaining or fun to look at as Heidi Klum or Padma, but he does seem genuinely kind and sympathetic to the contestants, like a poor man’s Tim Gunn. He quickly explains the first challenge and we discover how flawed and essentially useless this show is.

In theory, a show about showcasing interior design would involve redecorating homes, offices, restaurants and any other spaces we encounter in everyday life. Project Runway produces articles of clothing that end up at Banana Republic or on in and advertisement in a magazine. Every episode of Top Chef sees the preparation and execution of different types of meals, and it’s too silly to explain the relevancy of food. But on Top Design they’re apparently just decorating sets in a warehouse; windowless, three-walled rooms – identically empty waiting to be identically average, like an Ikea showroom.

The whole point of reality TV is the infinite space we’re allotted; reality has no boundaries. But like the last episode of a laugh-track sitcom, where the cast walks out and smiles for the audience, Top Design not only removes the fourth wall, it exposes the bizarre and naked space that exists without it. The designs are useless because they’re not in real spaces and most likely dismantled a few hours after they’re completed.

What wasn’t explicitly disappointing about the show was just confusing. There’s a transvestite Arquette sibling? He/She has enough clout to be called a “celebrity judge?” Do the Baldwins have a transvestite? And what’s the difference between a designer and a decorator? In most instances the terms seemed to be used interchangeably, but contestant Heather is quick to reference a difference: “I’m realizing we don’t have any design innovation. We’re being decorators not designers.” I suppose she didn’t like being called a decorator when she was voted off at the episode (with Storm!).

It would be nice to think Bravo could acknowledge this creative failure and stop milking the functional art utters, but there will be at least four other tacky incarnations before they give up. We might be only a season or two away from Top Glassblower or Project Blacksmith.